Solving Healthcare Cyber Challenges

Visibility and control over infrastructure

Healthcare’s Infrastructure Gap

Most cyberattacks in the healthcare sector do not start from complex vulnerabilities, but from known exposures: unsecured access, lack of network segmentation, or reliance on critical systems.

The issue is not only the initial compromise, but how these vulnerabilities allow rapid propagation across interconnected infrastructures. A single compromised point can simultaneously affect multiple systems, services, or organizations. In the healthcare context, the impact of such attacks goes beyond data breaches, directly affecting the continuity of medical services and access to critical care.

In practice, these attacks follow recurring patterns, based on access and propagation methods that consistently appear in incidents across the healthcare sector.

Common attack methods in the healthcare sector
Data breaches

Data breaches often result from compromised credentials, vulnerable medical applications, misconfigured cloud services, or unauthorized access. In such cases, medical data and patient information are exposed or exfiltrated, leading to legal consequences, loss of trust, and reputational damage.

Social engineering attacks

Social engineering involves manipulating medical staff, administrative personnel, or partners through phishing, vishing, smishing, or compromised institutional email accounts to obtain access credentials, introduce malware, or redirect payments.

Attackers may impersonate healthcare authorities, medical service providers, national health insurance entities, or executive staff, exploiting internal approval workflows and remote work conditions.

Ransomware and malware attacks

Ransomware and malware are used to encrypt systems, extract data, and disrupt operations. Increasingly, attacks involve “double extortion” mechanisms, combining data theft with system disruption, and in some cases, DDoS attacks.

In many cases, attackers remain within the infrastructure for a period of time before launching the attack, mapping critical systems and backups. Deployment time has significantly decreased, averaging around 24 hours.

Ransomware attacks directly impact clinical systems (HIS, EHR, EMR), where system unavailability immediately affects medical operations and access to essential patient data. Approximately 92% of European cases involve both file encryption and data exfiltration.

Supply chain attacks

Supply chain attacks involve compromising third-party medical applications, IT service providers, or outsourced processes to gain indirect access to hospitals and clinics.

Attackers exploit remote administration tools, software updates, cloud services, or medical data exchange channels to bypass security controls and obtain legitimate access within the network.

Credential theft

Credential theft is commonly carried out through fake notifications impersonating communications from hospitals or national health authorities, aiming to capture login credentials.

Attacks also include QR code redirections to malicious pages and the use of infostealers (e.g., RedLine, Vidar) to automatically collect credentials. There is also a growing trend of compromised healthcare credentials being sold online, including VPN or RDP access to hospital networks.

How cyberattacks manifest in healthcare in practice
1. AZ Monica Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium – 2026

A cyberattack on AZ Monica Hospital led to IT system outages and limited medical activity.

Over 70 surgeries were canceled, and patients were transferred to other facilities. Access to electronic medical records was unavailable, and recovery took approximately one month. This case highlights the direct impact of system outages on medical operations.

2. Synnovis / NHS UK – 2024

A ransomware attack on Synnovis, a laboratory service provider for NHS hospitals in London, directly impacted diagnostic capacity across multiple medical units.

Over 1,100 procedures were canceled, and laboratory processing capacity dropped significantly. At the same time, approximately 400 GB of medical data was exfiltrated and published, with full system recovery estimated to take over 17 months.

3. Ransomware attack on Romanian hospitals – 2024

A ransomware attack targeting the HIS Hipocrate platform affected multiple medical institutions in Romania, spreading rapidly due to a lack of segmentation.

Data was encrypted in 26 hospitals, while over 100 units were disconnected as a precaution. In some cases, medical activity temporarily reverted to manual processes. The ransom (~3.5 BTC) was not paid. The incident shows how lack of segmentation enables rapid spread across multiple organizations.

4. Change Healthcare / UnitedHealth – 2024

A cyberattack on Change Healthcare affected over 100 million individuals and disrupted critical processes such as billing and pharmaceutical supply chains. Initial access was obtained through compromised credentials, making it the largest breach in healthcare history.

5. Pro-Russian groups (Killnet) – 2023–2024

Between 2023 and 2024, several hospitals across Europe, including in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands, were targeted by coordinated DDoS attacks linked to pro-Russian groups such as Killnet.

These attacks did not involve system compromise or data exfiltration but affected the availability of digital services, including online platforms used by patients and staff.

Ultimately, cybersecurity becomes effective only when technology, processes, and the human factor work together in an integrated way. Regular training, phishing attack simulations, and risk awareness play a decisive role in reducing the attack surface.

Expertware, in partnership with the National Cybersecurity Directorate (DNSC), regularly organizes webinars focused on risk awareness across various sectors, the most recent one being in the healthcare sector. The presentation can be found here.

How these risks can be managed

In healthcare infrastructures, the objective is not a complete architectural overhaul, but the rapid reduction of exposure and detection time.

Using separate tools for vulnerabilities, monitoring, or audits often leads to blind spots where suspicious activity cannot be analyzed in time. In such conditions, incidents are detected late, and their impact extends into operations. In this context, the problem is no longer the lack of data, but the lack of correlation between them.

The role of an integrated security platform

In the context of NIS2 requirements, these capabilities become essential for ensuring continuous monitoring, risk management, and incident reporting. Full visibility across the infrastructure, asset inventory, and real-time data correlation enable healthcare organizations to meet compliance requirements while reducing operational risks.

A platform like SIEMBIOT addresses this need by centralizing and analyzing data in a single point. The difference lies not in the volume of collected data, but in the ability to correlate and interpret it within an operational context.

At a technical level, the platform correlates infrastructure events (logs, authentications, traffic) with existing vulnerabilities, the actual exposure level, and external threat intelligence (CTI), such as compromised credentials or indicators of compromise.

As a result, it does not only highlight vulnerabilities or alerts, but also their context: what is critical, what is exploitable, and where suspicious activity occurs.

Ultimately, cybersecurity becomes effective only when technology, processes, and the human factor work together in an integrated way. Regular training, phishing attack simulations, and risk awareness play a decisive role in reducing the attack surface.

Expertware, in partnership with the National Cybersecurity Directorate (DNSC), regularly organizes webinars focused on risk awareness across various sectors, the most recent one being in the healthcare sector. The presentation can be found here.

Causes of cyberattacks in the healthcare sector

Cyberattacks in healthcare are not driven solely by attack vectors, but also by the characteristics of hospital IT infrastructures, which limit prevention and response capabilities.

Many medical devices run on legacy systems (Windows XP/7), with lifecycles of 10–15 years and no vendor support. In such cases, patching is limited or impossible, leaving systems exposed for long periods.

At the same time, networks are often not segmented, using shared VLANs across administrative, clinical, and IoMT environments. Once initial access is gained, lateral movement becomes rapid and difficult to control.

Critical systems such as HIS or EHR operate continuously, with no real maintenance windows. Any disruption directly affects medical activity, limiting the ability to apply security updates or interventions.

Additionally, many protocols used in healthcare environments, such as DICOM, HL7v2, or Telnet, were not designed with security in mind and do not support modern protection mechanisms, increasing the attack surface.

Finally, the lack of robust backup strategies or insufficient testing of recovery processes makes post-incident recovery difficult and time-consuming.

24/7 monitoring and real-time detection

Continuous monitoring enables the rapid identification of suspicious activity, including outside working hours or during periods of reduced staffing, when early signals are often missed.

In a SIEMBIOT model with 24×7 SOC/MDR, logs, telemetry, and alerts from multiple sources are correlated in real time, and suspicious events are prioritized and analyzed quickly. This significantly reduces response time (from weeks to hours or days) and limits the spread of incidents across the infrastructure, including critical environments.

Without continuous monitoring, the time to identify an attack and the period during which it remains undetected (“dwell time”) can extend to weeks or months, giving attackers time for lateral movement, privilege escalation, and preparation of operational impact.

At the same time, integrating external data enables correlation between external exposure and internal activity, providing visibility into real risks. Without such an approach, attacks remain undetected until their operational impact becomes visible.

How the SIEMBIOT platform can be tested

The SIEMBIOT platform can be tested free of charge for 3 months through a European grant available until June.

Implementation does not require major infrastructure changes but enables a gradual increase in system visibility. Initially, logs are centralized and critical exposures are identified, followed by continuous monitoring and event correlation, and finally testing of response processes and generation of compliance reports.

To evaluate the platform in a real-world context, complete the contact form and the team will follow up with further details.

Cloud image

90 Days of Enterprise-Grade Cyber Defense

Step into the future of cybersecurity with full access to a unified, intelligent platform — free for 90 days. Empower your security team with:

  • Advanced SIEM for real-time visibility, smart alerting, and deep forensics across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments

  • Continuous Vulnerability Management to identify, prioritize, and remediate risk across all assets

  • Live Cyber Threat Intelligence integrated directly into your workflows, with global insights and attacker profiling

  • AI-Powered Threat Detection that learns from your environment, explains alerts in plain language, and suggests next steps

  • Built-in Compliance Readiness for NIS2, GDPR, ISO 27001, and more, with automated reporting and audit tools

Whether you're managing a lean SOC or a full-scale enterprise security team, this platform gives you the tools to detect faster, respond smarter, and stay ahead of evolving threats — all without the complexity.

Experience enterprise-grade protection, streamlined workflows, and total control.

Your 90-day head start begins now.

Unlock Your 3-Month Free Trial